Robert Walser is one of the important German-language writers of the twentieth century - a major writer, both of his four novels that have survived (my favourite is the third, written in 1908, Jakob Von Gunten) and for his short prose, where the musicality and free fall of his writing are less impleded by plot. Anyone seeking to bring Walser to a public that hase yet to discover him has as hand a whole arsenal of glorious comparasions. A Paul Klee in prose - as delicated, as sly, as haunted. A cross between Stevie Smith and Beckett: a good-humored, sweet Beckett. And, as literature's present inevitably remakes its past, so we cannot help but see Walser as the missing link between Kleist and Kafka, who admired him greatly. (At the time, it was more likely to be Kafka who was seen thorugh the prism of Walser. Robert Musil, other admirer among Walser's contemporaries, after first reading Kafka pronounced him "a peculiar case of the Walser type.") I get a similiar rush of pleasure from Walser's single-voiced short prose as I do from Leopardi's dialogue's and playets, the great weather in Walser's stories and sketches, their elegance and their unpredictable lenghts remind me of the free, first-person forms that abound in all classical literature: pillow book, poetic diary, "essays in ideleness." But any true lover of Walser will want to disregard the net of comparisons that one can throw over his work.
In long as in short prose Walser is minituraist, promulgating the claims of the anti-heroic, the limited, the humble, the small - as if in response to his acute feeling for the interminable. Walser's life illustrates the restleness of one kind of depressive temperament; he had the depressive's fascination with stasis, and with the way time distends, is consumed, and spent much of his life obsessively turning time into space: his walks. His work plays with the depressive's appalled vision of endleness: it is all voice - musing, conversing, rambling, running on. The important is redeemed as a species of the unimportant, wisdom as a kind of shy, valiant loquacity.
The moreal core of Walser's art is the refusal of power, of domination. I'm ordinay - that is, nobody - declares the characteistic Walser persona. In "Flower Days" (1911), Walser evokes the race of the "odd people, who lack character", who don't want to do anything. The recurrent "I" of Walser's prose is the opposite of the egotist's: it is that of someone "drowning in obedience." One knows about the repugnance Walser felt for sucess - the prodigious spread of failure that was his life. In "Kienast" (1917), Walser describes "a man who wanted nothing to do with anything". this non-doer was, of course, a proud, stupendously productive writer who secreted work, muc of it written in his astonishing micro-script, without pause. What Walser says about inaction, renunciation of effort, effortnless, is a program, an anti-romantic one, of the artist's activity. In "A Little Ramble" (1914) he observes: "We don't need to see anything out of the ordinary. We already see so much."
Walser often writes, from the point of view of acaualty, of the romantic visionary imaginations. "Kleist in Thun" (1913) both self-portrait and authortive tour of the menal landscape of suicide-destined, depicts the precipice on the edge of which Walser lived. The last paragraph, with his excruciating modulations, seals an account of mental ruin as grand as anything I know in literature. But most of his stories and sketches bring consciousness back from the brink. He is just having his "gentle and courteous bit of fun," Walser can assure us, in "Nervous" (1916), speaking in the first person.
"Grouches, grouches, one must have them, and one must have the courage to live with them. That's the nicest way to live. Nobody should be afraid of his little bid of weirdenss." The longest of the stories, "The Walk" (1917), identifies walking with a lyrical mobility and detachment of temperament, with the "raptures of freedmon"; darkness arrives only at the end. Walser's art assumes depression and terror, in order (mostly) to accept it - ironize over it, lighten it. These are gleeful as physical and characterological; anti-gravity writing, in praise of movement and sloughing off, weighlessness; portraits of consciousness walking about in the world, enjoying its "morsel of life", radiant with despair.
In Walser's fiction one is (as in so much of modern art) always inside a head, but his universe - and his despair - is anythig but solipsistic. It is charged with compassion: awareness of the creatureliness of life, of the fellowship of sadness. "What kind of people am I thinking of?" Walser's voice asks in "A Sort of Speech" (1925). "Of me, of you, of all our theatrical little dominations, of the freedmons that are none, of never pass up a chance for a joke, of the people who are desolate?" That question mark at the end of the answeer is a typical Walser courtesy. Walser's virtues are those of the most mature, most civilized art.
He is a truly wonderful, heartbreaking writer.Susan Sontag [1982]
